WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



ChesterRd 3:11 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
spot on exeter

WHU(Exeter) 2:22 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
"The obvious fact is that we need one or two players who" blah, blah, blah....

The obvious fact is that this Board have spent decades in the game, have learnt fuck all from any of their mistakes, continue to make them, repeatedly fail to produce anything that lives up to their promises, repeatedly undermine the managers that THEY employ, players that they sanction the inward transfers of, and have a long track record of relegating clubs, or seeing them in regular relegation scraps, after claiming that they've assembled the best squads ever.

That is the obvious fact.

Leatherhead Hammer 2:13 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
All Brady had to say, when speaking about the upcoming transfer window, was something like "we hope to strengthen the squad to enable us to push up the table"
Instead she chooses to publicly belittle a player, who is still on our books. Any potential West Ham targets could be put off joining us after reading such comments from one of our board members.

Jaan Kenbrovin 1:46 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
Didn't need to mention him but I don't see any problem here. It's no secret that it didn't work out with Snodgrass, as that is why he is on loan at Villa.

It's also the biggest and latest example of a January transfer we should be looking to avoid repeating.

The Kronic 1:45 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
What she needs is a good fucking kick in the cunt. Or cock.
Impossible to tell really.

Keep dreaming 10:53 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
Kaiser Zoso 9:12 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
The crime in my opinion, is some cunt bought him in the first place.

I’m not bothered what anyone says in the media, it doesn’t affect how many points we get, or cups we win


Lunatic

Sven Roeder 10:35 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
They might not like it but I don’t imagine any football player would complain about criticism by the manager or coaches.
Might be pissed off that the Office Manager is giving her opinion

Would love Snodgrass to give his opinion of her performance in selling the clubs soul and moving to an athletics stadium

lufbra iron 10:27 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
her comments are financially damaging as well as any adverse affect on morale.

I know shipping the cunt out on loan to a Championship club doesn't exactly tell the world the club thinks he is a decent asset, but then publicly telling the world, in print, that he is not valued by the board, does not exactly give them great leverage when negotiating his fee when he is eventually sold.

The only thing she is useful for is producing a daughter who is a SCORCHER

Alex G 10:21 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
Nicey 11:25 Sat Dec 30

To do that surely he'd have to get up in court and argue that his transfer to West Ham had been a triumph for the club.

Don't think many footballers have clauses in their contracts saying they are not allowed to be fairly criticised by their employers.

Private Dancer 3:24 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
On The Ball 7:35 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
It's not about sticking up for Snograss, it's about the fact that she shouldn't be criticising one of our players.''


Bullshit. It's about time these overpaid clowns got a bit of stick. Don't know why you are so offended, well except for the fact that you're a proper minge.

Darby_ 2:29 Sun Dec 31
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
I was reading the Aston Villa board the other day, and they were saying that Snodgrass was awful, and that he didn’t deserve to start.

If he’s struggling in the Championship, I can’t see him ever playing in the Premier League again. It could be that G&S&B have realised this and have either written him off or are trying to send a rocket up his arse.

camel-with-3-humps 11:56 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
Brady is a sheep,copying that filth Sullivan in slagging off Snodgrass.

What outcome could she possibly hope for other than creating some controversy to inflate her media profile?

The West Ham public relations boss must be tearing his hair out at having to deal with these morons.

Brady thinks she's clever - but she's filth.

DukeofDevo 11:40 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
I’d rather have Snodgrass in the team than Ayew!

No mention of that waster, he deserves a column on his own!

chim chim cha boo 11:37 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
jakehammer 10:06 Sat Dec 30

I agree. You could be sure he'd be a fan favourite after all the bollocks that the board have heaped on him. He'd have a lot of support from the fans because that's how our minds work. I guess he'd play a lot better too if he was actually played in his correct position instead of being our 'Payet replacement' on the fucking left.

Nicey 11:25 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
He is an employee of the club. Doesn’t he have employee rights? Could he resign and claim constructive dismissal like curbs?

Sydney_Iron 10:57 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
Surprised he hasnt got a recall? depending on the terms of his loan of course.

"Be like a new signing for us"

Athletico Easthamico 10:08 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
Well I hope when the RWHFAG have their meeting they mention this silly tart's crappy column making a laughing stock of the club.

Nothing's changed here.

jakehammer 10:06 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
i might be on my own here and we shouldn't have signed Snodgrass, but I bet that jock to jock, moyes could get him working quite well in our team despite what the 3 twats think of him.
it's all a question of good management and I don't reckon that anyone could really deny that moyes is a better manager than bilic.
like I say, I might be on my own here, but I reckon that Moyes ought to have a go with Snodgrass as he's been reasonable with other teams he's played for.

Takashi Miike 10:06 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
do people still believe the managers have a say in signings? hahahaha

Any Old Iron 9:26 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
Sullivans brass showing yet again what an absolute cunt she is. If the owners had a grain of class they'd fire her for slagging off a club employee in print.

The filth that run our once great club will be the runiation of it.

Johnson 9:18 Sat Dec 30
Re: Lady Muck’s view on Snodgrass
Yes a three man committee bought him, as they do all our transfer - bar Sullivan’s own little one obviously.

Regardless of how he got here, a board member slagging him off is cuntish and unprofessional. It’s just not something you’d want your board to do - well normal folk wouldn’t.

I think it’s you who’s got the shit argument here.

Prev - Page 2 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: